Here we cover. I am referring to the economic (or whatever his, ah yes, the financial crisis). Us - is a company where I was, at any given time, embody the idea of quality through the introduction of ISO 9000 .
Identified and selected in a process of "Human Resources". Even painted the landscape in back (I understand specialists and deputy director of quality)! The objectives, criteria and indicators of the process! How many copies have been broken and the blood drunk (and mine as well) so far to substantiate the need for the Director General of such a process the company developed a process map so far, have agreed with all stakeholders, defining responsibilities of each. Why do afoot personnel management in the company? In my experience (unfortunately) there were no examples, when we had to work for a company with a competent personalschikom, ideally, and even with some personalschikom general. Forgive me, personnel managers and even more assistants and / or personnel director. What never happened. Consider staff and manage staff - two different things. Know the needs, demands and desires of staff to be able to competently in this play, to use the knowledge, experience and competence to achieve significant results - that's the problem personalschikov. And this is not a simple one of the first people in the company. That's their opinion, and sometimes intuition, listens CEO. They possess and use an assessment of competence, value contribution, effectiveness and efficiency of personnel costs. They create the "gold reserve" of the company, certify, offer motivational mechanisms for the management of the company more efficient personnel management.
And what do we have? It is young, and I believe, a promising staff, primarily cut or forced to leave without pay. That they do not raise wages. It is their (the youth) are afraid to teach. And the explanation is, in principle, simple.
Here Maryvanna, worked for 45 years anywhere in the enterprise has not gone. Even if no content to send. All the same, because the pension received. Live. And the pre-retirement age (and sometimes retirement) and generally reliable from all sides. Add it to 15 cents (exaggeration) to paycheck and do it from us to stay. Dashing times will pass (the economic crisis, for example), and Maryvanna remain. "Reliable as all the civilian fleet." But the Jackdaw, though intelligent and hardworking, but some are not reliable because of their age. Nothing at all for 25 years. That taught her, and she will retire and leave or on maternity leave. And then Alexei, Alexei won. Suddenly married. So he will have to pay raise, as a family to feed - it's not you holostyakovat. And no one knows the history of jackdaws - a single mother and sole breadwinner in the family, and stories Leshka. A pity.
If you knew for sure that management decisions would have been quite different. It turns out that the problem is - omolozhat staff, reduce the average age of employees in the company, but in practice, the director sees no future in the young generation, even if the young. It's sad. The crisis is over, and CEO will remain with nothing, or rather with MarIvannoy.
Quality and effective management decisions to you, gentlemen!


















One Comment
We have a similar situation. Several times I tried to explain to senior management that the department of personnel and human resource management are completely different things. Also been isolated process "Personnel Management", carried out monitoring of employee satisfaction. And that's it! Does not want our senior management and to spend a penny on the basic needs of people. Well, about the motivation of staff, and even more so, do not want to hear ... and nothing! And when properly motivate people, and a positive climate in the team and the people who want to work, want to introduce new ideas, etc. And here, at least for days work, but you will not be any bonuses or other incentives, while not developed in the organization at least 25 years.