Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology approves national standards:
- Order № 471-item of 18 December 2008 GOST R ISO 9001-2008 "Quality Systems mendzhmenta. Requirements "with the date November 13, 2009 introduction of the law so early application;
- Order № 470-item of 18 December 2008 GOST R ISO 9000-2008 "Quality Systems mendzhmenta. Fundamentals and vocabulary "with the date of introduction of October 9, 2009 and callable application.
Standards are in the process of publication and may be used as information material to the official edition (www.vniis.ru).
And all would be fine, but once again step on the same rake. Version of ISO 2001 in the national execution waited 9 months (born in the throes of a child). And so I wanted to believe that even with the version of 2008, we will keep pace with the global community. Out of step ...
I in this situation, sad and depressed for very practical reasons. In March, the company where I can embody at this time, should go to the certification of quality management system. A customer of the system, as a rule, general manager, and it also sets the terms. And so the delay of several months in anticipation of the official version just does not go into any time and resource limits. So certified will be in compliance with standards ISO 2001 version of the year, and then in the recertification catch to perfection, which, as we know, there is no limit.
10 Comments
... Not the country called Honduras!
Management of the organization where I work, do not think about the necessity of annual audits, the need to move on any other version of the standards. Have to "fight" in the literal sense of the word for every change ...
Thank you very much for modified versions, and links to state standards documents for their approval.
to NatalyM
Annual audits? An audit for the entire year? Or do program audits of the company (divisions, or processes)?
No, no, in this case I mean the external audits that are conducted in our once a year. A domestic - well, no time, there is a program (plan) audits a year, according to which each department audit is conducted two times a year. But more basically does not work, because so many departments and auditors - I - the main and one girl is just an auditor. So I say that the leadership did not fully understand the need for QMS orgnizatsii, only to have removed from the auction is not ...
to NatalyM
If I understand you correctly - in your company just two auditor? What about the spending review? What a fresh perspective?
With this big problem, however, break through the wall of misunderstanding is very difficult. As long as necessary to pull all by yourself, and get a fresh perspective by studying different materials, as well as during external audits.
We re-certification is scheduled for July 2009, but we already certified on version 2008. I do not see obstacles, unless of course you sertifitsiruetes GOST R. But I have no idea, because I have been working in Ukraine and in Russia, other legislation. We certify to ISO 9001:2008, although we still have no official DSTU ISO 9001:2008.
to vnuchka
In fact of the matter is that in the GOST R, this would require the official version. If the company was certified in another system, then problems would not really be there.
Yes, in this case, my sympathy, so to speak, God help you.
"So, have certified to ISO 2001 version, and then in the recertification catch to perfection .."
likely to go to Editor, 2008. you can go next year as part of the supervisory audit. It is not necessary to wait for reserta.